Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Radical existentialism meets cognitive science: a review of converging qualitative and quantitative perspectives in research into tertiary students' learning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper presents an exploration of some research perspectives in student learning in higher education. In this area there is a strong qualitative tradition of researching how students learn in real contexts, as well as quantitative research applying cognitivist models and psychometric instruments to student learning. The paper aims to analyse the points of convergence between these different research paradigms, relating to students' approaches to learning and learning outcomes. The results of this exploration show that from independent origins, within different research paradigms, emerged some remarkably similar ideas relating to students' approaches to learning and learning outcomes. Cross-fertilisation across research programs within and between different paradigms has occurred, which has enriched research into student learning in higher education.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationBridging the Gap between Ideas and Doing Research: Proceedings of the Inaugural Postgraduate Research Conference
EditorsTerrence Hays, Rafat Hussain
Place of PublicationDeakin West, Australia
PublisherAustralian College of Educators
Pages301-313
ISBN (Print)9781920819231
Publication statusPublished - 2007
EventBridging the Gap between Ideas and Doing Research 2006: Inaugural Postgraduate Research Conference - Armidale, Australia
Duration: 8 Aug 200611 Aug 2006

Conference

ConferenceBridging the Gap between Ideas and Doing Research 2006: Inaugural Postgraduate Research Conference
CityArmidale, Australia
Period8/08/0611/08/06

Keywords

  • Higher Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Radical existentialism meets cognitive science: a review of converging qualitative and quantitative perspectives in research into tertiary students' learning'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this