Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Queensland Magistrates' Judicial Development Project

Stephen Colbran

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    Earlier this year all Queensland Magistrates were circulated with a detailed plan for the 'Queensland Magistrates Development Project' (the project). The project is contentious and brings into focus the tension between accountability and judicial independence. The project offers magistrates an opportunity for judicial self-improvement based on their own personal observations, opinions of a trusted mentor, and statistical data from participants in the magistrates court process. For many magistrates judicial performance evaluation is as fearsome prospect, one hell bent on undermining judicial independence and centuries of legal tradition. Others take a more liberal view and see the potential for performance evaluation as a useful tool for professional self-development. These contrasting views are based on different perceptions of what the concept of judicial performance evaluation may involve. There is no doubt that a judicial performance evaluation scheme imposed by the executive, reporting to the public, perhaps even offering interstate comparisons and productivity bonuses would be unacceptable to the Australian judiciary. Such an approach would breach the doctrine of separation of powers, begin to undermine judicial independence, and would be vigorously opposed by the judiciary and the legal profession alike – and rightly so. Instances of such an approach have been evident in attempts by remuneration commissions at commonwealth and state levels to introduce performance based salary packaging. Consider then an alternative approach whereby a voluntary judicial performance evaluation scheme is introduced by magistrates for magistrates. Many of you are perhaps wondering why magistrates should consider participating in such a project? The answer is that magistrates are professionals. They are interested in learning about their strengths and weaknesses as perceived by others. They are interested in continuing judicial education. They are interested in professional self-development.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages1-17
    Publication statusPublished - 2002
    EventAIJA Magistrates 2002: 2nd Annual Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Magistrates' Conference - Brisbane, Australia
    Duration: 13 Sept 200214 Sept 2002

    Conference

    ConferenceAIJA Magistrates 2002: 2nd Annual Australasian Institute of Judicial Administration Magistrates' Conference
    CityBrisbane, Australia
    Period13/09/0214/09/02

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Queensland Magistrates' Judicial Development Project'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this