Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Public Value: Conjecture And Refutation, Theory And Ethics

  • Bligh Grant
  • , Josie A Fisher

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores the theory of Public Value and the debate it has created in public management theory and practice. Public Value was first articulated by Mark Moore (1995). Scholars of public administration have argued, on the one hand, that Public Value can 'solve the puzzle' of 'balancing democracy and efficiency' in democracies (Stoker, 2006a; Wallis and Gregory, 2009) and on the other, that it constitutes a dangerous return to the justification for public managers as 'Platonic guardians' of political systems (Rhodes and Wanna, 2007). We argue that this debate neglects that Moore provides an ethical foundation for public managers to exercise autonomy in decision-making; thereby giving them a renewed legitimacy, importance and confidence when managing for unknowable futures.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 24th Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference
EditorsB Gurd
Place of PublicationBrisbane, Australia
PublisherAustralian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM)
Pages1-15
ISBN (Print)1877040827
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventANZAM 2010: 24th Annual Australian New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Managing for Unknowable Futures - Adelaide, Australia
Duration: 6 Dec 201010 Dec 2010

Conference

ConferenceANZAM 2010: 24th Annual Australian New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Managing for Unknowable Futures
CityAdelaide, Australia
Period6/12/1010/12/10

Keywords

  • Organisation and Management Theory
  • Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagement

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Public Value: Conjecture And Refutation, Theory And Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this