Abstract
This paper explores the theory of Public Value and the debate it has created in public management theory and practice. Public Value was first articulated by Mark Moore (1995). Scholars of public administration have argued, on the one hand, that Public Value can 'solve the puzzle' of 'balancing democracy and efficiency' in democracies (Stoker, 2006a; Wallis and Gregory, 2009) and on the other, that it constitutes a dangerous return to the justification for public managers as 'Platonic guardians' of political systems (Rhodes and Wanna, 2007). We argue that this debate neglects that Moore provides an ethical foundation for public managers to exercise autonomy in decision-making; thereby giving them a renewed legitimacy, importance and confidence when managing for unknowable futures.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the 24th Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management Conference |
| Editors | B Gurd |
| Place of Publication | Brisbane, Australia |
| Publisher | Australian and New Zealand Academy of Management (ANZAM) |
| Pages | 1-15 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1877040827 |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
| Event | ANZAM 2010: 24th Annual Australian New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Managing for Unknowable Futures - Adelaide, Australia Duration: 6 Dec 2010 → 10 Dec 2010 |
Conference
| Conference | ANZAM 2010: 24th Annual Australian New Zealand Academy of Management Conference: Managing for Unknowable Futures |
|---|---|
| City | Adelaide, Australia |
| Period | 6/12/10 → 10/12/10 |
Keywords
- Organisation and Management Theory
- Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Engagement
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Public Value: Conjecture And Refutation, Theory And Ethics'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver