Abstract
Polybios verfasst seine Historien zwar in einem bisweilen sehr umstandlichen und um groBtmogliche Genauigkeit auf Kosten der Lesbarkeit bemuhten Griechisch, bleibt damit aber weitgehend im Bereich der Literatursprache. Gerade weil in der hellenistischen Zeit die Inschriftenprosa eine durchaus eigene Entwicklung genommen hat, wie Jonas Palm zeigen konnte, ist ein bestimmter Einfluss der Inschriftensprache auf die zeitgenossische Historiographie dennoch nicht vollig auszuschlieBen. Eine direkte aber auch leicht erklarbare Beeinflussung liegt in dem ansonsten sehr selten bezeugten ubertragenen Gebrauch des Wortes Stele vor, das in Polybios’ Schilderung der achaischen Einigungspolitik im ersten Drittel des 2. Jahrhunderts v.Chr. eine groBe Rolle spielt und das er direkt dem offiziellen Sprachgebrauch des Achaerbundes entlehnt hat. Wie der Vergleich der entsprechenden Stellen bei Polybios mit dem einzigen erhaltenen inschriftlichen Sympolitievertrag des Achaerbundes gezeigt hat, gebrauchte die offizielle achaische Amtsspracheden Begriff Stele, um die Beitrittsvertrage (Homologie–Abkommen) mit den neu beitretenden Mitgliedern zu bezeichnen.
Though Polybius wrote his Histories in a style, which at expense of readability was rather complex and acribic, he kept himself within the boundaries of the Hellenistic literary style, therefore the idea of a special ‘chancellery’ style must be abandoned. Yet since the epigraphical prose style developed distinctive features in Hellenistic times, as shown by Jonas Palm, one cannot exclude the possibility that those features had a certain influence on contemporary historiography. Direct influence can be shown in the way the word ‘stele’ is used, which plays a prominent role in Polybius’ narrative on the Achaean policy of unifying the Peloponnesus in the 2nd century BCE. This term he borrowed directly from the official use of the Achaean political language. As demonstrated by comparison with the only epigraphically preserved document of sympoliteia from the Achaean league (SIG³ 490), the term ‘stele’ was used to officially designate the treaties (homologia), with which new members were accepted to the league.
Though Polybius wrote his Histories in a style, which at expense of readability was rather complex and acribic, he kept himself within the boundaries of the Hellenistic literary style, therefore the idea of a special ‘chancellery’ style must be abandoned. Yet since the epigraphical prose style developed distinctive features in Hellenistic times, as shown by Jonas Palm, one cannot exclude the possibility that those features had a certain influence on contemporary historiography. Direct influence can be shown in the way the word ‘stele’ is used, which plays a prominent role in Polybius’ narrative on the Achaean policy of unifying the Peloponnesus in the 2nd century BCE. This term he borrowed directly from the official use of the Achaean political language. As demonstrated by comparison with the only epigraphically preserved document of sympoliteia from the Achaean league (SIG³ 490), the term ‘stele’ was used to officially designate the treaties (homologia), with which new members were accepted to the league.
| Translated title of the contribution | Polybius and Epigraphy: The Language Use of a Historian |
|---|---|
| Original language | German |
| Title of host publication | Polybios und seine Historien |
| Editors | Volker Grieb, Clemens Koehn |
| Place of Publication | Stuttgart, Germany |
| Publisher | Franz Steiner Verlag |
| Pages | 159-181 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9783515104777, 3515104771, 9783515105736, 3515105735 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Publication series
| Name | Alte Geschichte |
|---|
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Polybius and Epigraphy: The Language Use of a Historian: Zum Sprachgebrauch des Historikers'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver