Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Policy mobilities and methodology: a proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies

  • Kalervo N Gulson
  • , Stephen Lewis
  • , Bob Lingard
  • , Christopher Lubienski
  • , Keita Takayama
  • , P Taylor Webb

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

120 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The argument of this paper is that new methodologies associated with the emerging field of 'policy mobilities' can be applied, and are in fact required, to examine and research the networked and relational, or 'topological', nature of globalised education policy, which cuts across the new spaces of policymaking and new modes of global educational governance. In this paper, we examine the methodological issues pertaining to the study of the movement of policy. Informed by contemporary methodological thinking around social network analysis and the ethnographic notion of 'following the policy', we discuss the limitations of these approaches to adequately address presence in policy network analysis, and the problem of representing speed and intensity of policy mobility, even while these attempt to solve the problem of relationality and territoriality. We conclude that the methodologies of policy mobility are inexorably intertwined with the (constantly) changing phenomena under examination, and hence require what Lury and Wakeford describe as 'inventive methods'.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)224-241
JournalCritical Studies in Education
Volume58
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Comparative and Cross-Cultural Education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Policy mobilities and methodology: a proposition for inventive methods in education policy studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this