TY - CHAP
T1 - Person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo
T2 - Historical origins and functional motivation
AU - Post, Mark
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - Scott DeLancey's analysis of person-sensitive TAME marking in Lhasa Tibetan - "a.k.a. conjunct-disjunct marking" or "egophoricity" - has stimulated considerable discussion and debate, particularly as previously little-known languages of the Tibeto-Burman area, as well as outside it, have come to be described, and a wider range of functional factors have been taken into account. This chapter is intended as a contribution to this discussion, by presenting the first detailed analysis of person -sensitive TAME marking in a language of the Tani subgroup of Tibeto-Burman, namely Galo. Like Tournadre (2008), I find that person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo is not a grammaticalized index of person ("agreement") nor of cross-clause subject continuity, but is instead a semantic index of an assertor's knowledge state. Unlike in more westerly Tibeto-Burman languages, however, different construals of agency and/or volition do not seem to be factors in the Galo system. Thus, there are both similarities and differences underlying systems of person-sensitive TAME marking in different Tibeto-Burman languages; this suggests that further research - particularly, employing a diachronic perspective when possible - will be required before we can confidently characterize person-sensitive TAME marking from a pan-Tibeto-Burman (or broader) cross-linguistic perspective.
AB - Scott DeLancey's analysis of person-sensitive TAME marking in Lhasa Tibetan - "a.k.a. conjunct-disjunct marking" or "egophoricity" - has stimulated considerable discussion and debate, particularly as previously little-known languages of the Tibeto-Burman area, as well as outside it, have come to be described, and a wider range of functional factors have been taken into account. This chapter is intended as a contribution to this discussion, by presenting the first detailed analysis of person -sensitive TAME marking in a language of the Tani subgroup of Tibeto-Burman, namely Galo. Like Tournadre (2008), I find that person-sensitive TAME marking in Galo is not a grammaticalized index of person ("agreement") nor of cross-clause subject continuity, but is instead a semantic index of an assertor's knowledge state. Unlike in more westerly Tibeto-Burman languages, however, different construals of agency and/or volition do not seem to be factors in the Galo system. Thus, there are both similarities and differences underlying systems of person-sensitive TAME marking in different Tibeto-Burman languages; this suggests that further research - particularly, employing a diachronic perspective when possible - will be required before we can confidently characterize person-sensitive TAME marking from a pan-Tibeto-Burman (or broader) cross-linguistic perspective.
KW - Asian Languages (excl South-East Asian)
KW - Indian Languages
KW - Linguistic Structures (incl Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)
UR - http://trove.nla.gov.au/version/193642056
M3 - Chapter
SN - 9789027271976
SN - 9789027206848
T3 - Typological Studies in Language
SP - 107
EP - 130
BT - Functional-Historical Approaches to Explanation: In honor of Scott DeLancey
A2 - Thornes, Tim
A2 - Andvik, Erik
A2 - Hyslop, Gwendolyn
A2 - Jansen, Joana
PB - John Benjamins Publishing Company
CY - Amsterdam, Netherlands
ER -