Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Peripheral intravenous catheters: the impact of compliance with standards on patient-reported experience measures

Bhavna Brijball, Renata Hadzic, Alisa Shvartsbart, Bernadette R Findlay, Matthew Harland, Timothy De Solom, Fatemeh Emadi, Jonathan Penm, Jennifer A Stevens

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Although peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is a frequent and often essential part of inpatient treatment, a significant proportion of patients do not receive recommended PIVC care. A study across 51 countries comparing practices with recommendations found widespread variation. Peripheral intravenous catheters were inserted at inappropriate sites (69%), covered with substandard dressings (20%), showed visible signs of redness and swelling at the insertion site (10%), and malfunctioned (e.g. leaked) (10%).1 Poorly placed and secured PIVCs have been associated with worse patient-reported outcome measures including pain, distress, and sleep disturbance from alarming, occluded pumps.2,3

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-3
JournalAnaesthesia and Intensive Care
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Peripheral intravenous catheters: the impact of compliance with standards on patient-reported experience measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this