Abstract
Although peripheral intravenous catheter (PIVC) insertion is a frequent and often essential part of inpatient treatment, a significant proportion of patients do not receive recommended PIVC care. A study across 51 countries comparing practices with recommendations found widespread variation. Peripheral intravenous catheters were inserted at inappropriate sites (69%), covered with substandard dressings (20%), showed visible signs of redness and swelling at the insertion site (10%), and malfunctioned (e.g. leaked) (10%).1 Poorly placed and secured PIVCs have been associated with worse patient-reported outcome measures including pain, distress, and sleep disturbance from alarming, occluded pumps.2,3
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-3 |
| Journal | Anaesthesia and Intensive Care |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 2 Dec 2025 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Peripheral intravenous catheters: the impact of compliance with standards on patient-reported experience measures'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver