Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Peopling the last new worlds: The first colonisation of Sahul and the Americas

Iain Davidson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    40 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    When people set foot in Sahul (Australia and New Guinea) about 50 thousand years ago, they entered a new world which had not seen any species of hominin before. More than 30 thousand years later, people moved into the cold regions of eastern Siberia, across the dry Bering Strait and into North America. In colonizing the north and the Americas they were similarly entering previously unvisited new worlds. The two continents were both colonized only by people who were modern in their biology and their behavior, but the outcomes of those colonizations were rather different. After 50 thousand years or so of human occupation, Australia remained 'a continent of hunter-gatherers' who, for one reason or another, never participated to any great extent in the agriculture that emerged early in the northern part of the continent of Sahul; the Americas, after perhaps 15 thousand years had some hunter-gatherers but also had seen the emergence of agriculture based on its diverse species of plants - an agriculture that spread far beyond the centers of domestication - and at least two of the primary states with complex social hierarchies and urban centers marked by pyramids. What factors contributed to this differentiation?
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-29
    JournalQuaternary International
    Volume285
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2013

    Keywords

    • Archaeology of New Guinea and Pacific Islands (excl New Zealand)
    • Archaeological Science
    • Archaeology of Asia, Africa and the Americas
    • Archaeology of Australia (excl Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Peopling the last new worlds: The first colonisation of Sahul and the Americas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this