Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Partnered governance of biodiversity

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Agriculture is a major cause of biodiversity loss. International instruments, particularly the Convention on Biological Diversity and the Sustainable Development Goals, impose obligations on the Brazilian and Australian Governments that can only be satisfied if they engage agriculture in biodiversity conservation. This chapter discusses innovative industry stewardship approaches to biodiversity conservation that use partnered (or hybrid) arrangements between industry and government. To demonstrate the development of this emerging innovative approach, five aspects of hybrid governance are analysed: (1) International farm industry initiatives, (2) Domestic farm industry initiatives, (3) Alignment of international and domestic responses, (4) International alignment of public and private responses and (5) Alignment of public and private responses at the domestic level. These issues are examined within the context of four major agricultural industries in Brazil and Australia: cotton, sugarcane, beef and dairy.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationAchieving Biodiversity Protection in Megadiverse Countries: A Comparative Assessment of Australia and Brazil
EditorsPaul Martin, Marcia Dieguez Leuzinger, Solange Teles da Silva, Gabriel Leuzinger Coutinho
Place of PublicationLondon, United Kingdom
PublisherRoutledge
Pages125-147
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9780367265274, 0367265273, 9780429296239, 9781000052275, 9781000052367, 9781000052459, 0429296231, 1000052273, 1000052362, 1000052451
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2020

Publication series

NameRoutledge Studies in Biodiversity Politics and Management

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Partnered governance of biodiversity'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this