Abstract
We discuss genomic selection as a way to provide information on breeding values for traits that are difficult to select for. A brief review of genomic prediction methods shows that currently in sheep, genomic prediction requires selection candidates to be genetically related to a reference population although it allows information of more distantly related individuals to contribute to selection accuracy. Subsequently we discuss genomic selection in a sheep breeding program context and discuss possible ways to optimize genotyping strategies in a breeding nucleus. Genotyping a proportion of pre-selected young males saves costs without compromising genetic gain, making genotyping cost effective even at a high testing cost. When only counting expressions of genetic gain in two tiers, the optimal proportion of males genotyped becomes lower and genotyping becomes prohibitive if testing costs are above $100 per head, unless breeding males can be used in the first year.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics |
| Editors | William Pattie |
| Place of Publication | Armidale, Australia |
| Publisher | Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics (AAABG) |
| Pages | 315-322 |
| Volume | 19 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9780646559155 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | AAABG 2011: 19th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics - Perth, Australia Duration: 19 Jul 2011 → 21 Jul 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | AAABG 2011: 19th Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics |
|---|---|
| City | Perth, Australia |
| Period | 19/07/11 → 21/07/11 |
Keywords
- Animal Breeding
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Optimizing sheep breeding programs with genomic selection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver