Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Open versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

  • Daniel Jewiss
  • , Cecilia Ostman
  • , Neil Smart

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background. There is no consensus on whether closed kinetic chain (CKC) or open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises should be the intervention of choice following an anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury or reconstruction. Methods. A systematic search identified randomized controlled trials of OKC versus CKC exercise training in people who had undergone ACL reconstructive surgery. All published studies in this systematic review were comparisons between OKC and CKC groups. Results. Seven studies were included. Lysholm knee scoring scale was not significantly different betweenOKC and CKC exercise patients: MD: −1.03%; CI: −13.02, 10.95; 𝑝 value = 0.87 (Chi2 = 0.18, df = 1, and 𝑝 value = 0.67). Hughston clinic questionnaire scores were not significantly different between OKC and CKC exercise patients: MD: −1.29% (−12.02, 9.43); 𝑝 value = 0.81 (Chi2 = 0.01, df = 1, and 𝑝 value = 0.93). Conclusions. While OKC and CKC may be beneficial during ACL surgical rehabilitation, there is insufficient evidence to suggest that either one is superior to the other.
Original languageEnglish
Article number4721548
Pages (from-to)1-10
JournalJournal of Sports Medicine
Volume2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Exercise Physiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Open versus Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises following an Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this