Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

On common ground: designing strategic spatial governance to advance integrated natural resource management and environmental outcomes

David J Brunckhorst

    Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

    Abstract

    Despite a growing body of theory that emphasises the importance of sociospatial aspects in the representation of community interests, regionalisation for natural resource governance remains dominated by river catchments. At the same time, across many nations, local governments are being given increasing responsibilities for environmental and resource management, but work within boundaries that are largely historical artefacts. The confluence of these trends suggests that it is timely to examine the requirements for spatial definition of resource governance regions. A considerable body of research on 'place' attachment, social networks, and participatory resource management combined with institutional theory and political science suggests that joining forces to take responsibility for collective action towards sustainability is more likely within particular social-ecological contexts and scales.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages85-101
    Publication statusPublished - 2009
    EventProductivity Commission Roundtable 2008 - Canberra, Australia
    Duration: 19 Aug 200820 Aug 2008

    Conference

    ConferenceProductivity Commission Roundtable 2008
    CityCanberra, Australia
    Period19/08/0820/08/08

    Keywords

    • Environmental Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'On common ground: designing strategic spatial governance to advance integrated natural resource management and environmental outcomes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this