Abstract
The public debate around food cofidence stimulated by food scares, the opening up of wider food markets and the introduction of GM foods provides an opportunity to analyse citizens’ identification with their community sociologically, as it is reproduced through mundane practices. In order to do so, this article examines the GM food debate in Italy and the implications for food and agricultural policy of Austria’s entry into the EU. Britain, with its highly industrialized agriculture and political commitment to open markets and new technologies, acts as a benchmark. We distinguish between disembedded and embedded trust regimes; the former being predominant in freer markets and the latter a resource which can be mobilized in cases where remnants of ‘traditional’ agricultural production and supply can still be found (Italy and Austria). The increasing emphasis upon the regional origin of food, its traceability and organic production by key actors – the state, consumers’ movements, retailers and marketing boards – we interpret as a confidence-building strategy which attempts to address deficits in disembedded trust resulting from widening chains of interdependency, crises such as BSE and the introduction of unfamiliar new technologies.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 213-244 |
| Journal | European Societies |
| Volume | 3 |
| Issue number | 2 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1 Jun 2001 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 2 Zero Hunger
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Novel food, new markets and trust regimes responses to the erosion of consumers' confidence in austria, Italy and the UK'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver