Abstract
This essay critiques the relevance of historical antecedents about children's play in nature and how these historical and political mechanisms create cultural norms and dominant discourses that sustain nature-human dualisms. Provoked by Taylor's (2013) exploration of the pervasive influence of romanticised images of innocent children in nature and our own experiences of never-ending 'nice' stories about young children in nature, here we trouble how nature experiences may or may not preclude children's meaningful and agentic participation in sustainability. We question is engagement with nature, a tangible and easily accessible approach in early childhood education (ECE) promoting a 'nature by default paradigm' and potentially thwarting a fuller transformative engagement with sustainability. Thus, we argue the case for shifting our frames beyond idealised romanticised notions and human-nature dualisms to a 'common worlds' (Haraway, 2008; Latour, 2004; Taylor, 2013) frame guided by collectivist understandings within connective life worlds. Such a shift requires a significant recasting of ethical human-nature understandings and relationships in ECE.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 57-64 |
| Journal | Australian Journal of Environmental Education |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Early Childhood Education (excl. Maori)
- Curriculum and Pedagogy Theory and Development
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nature by Default in Early Childhood Education for Sustainability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver