Abstract
One potential means to develop students' contextual and conceptual understanding of mathematics is through Inquiry Learning. However, introducing a problem context can distract from mathematical content. Incorporating argumentation practices into Inquiry may address this through providing a stronger reliance on mathematical evidence and reasoning. This paper presents a framework derived from the implementation of multiple, successive Argument-Based Inquiry units to 8-10 year olds. Three key knowledge domains are identified: mathematical, contextual and argumentation knowledge. Key components and roles of each domain are addressed and offered as an initial framework for further research.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 214-221 |
| Journal | Opening up mathematics education research (Proceedings of the 39th annual conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia) |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
| Event | MERGA 39: 39th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia - Adelaide, Australia Duration: 3 Jul 2016 → 7 Jul 2016 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Mathematics is just 1+1=2, what is there to argue about?": Developing a Framework for Argument-Based Mathematical Inquiry'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver