Abstract
While acclaimed for her classicism, her erudition, her interest in the sacred and the uni versal, Marguerite Y ourcenar has not remained inviolate to attack from critics. One area of attack-from both men and women-grows out of her portrayal of women in her fiction and non-fiction. Her female characters are perceived as marginalised, unsympathetically portrayed, silent, mere intermediaries in the power play between men, and as victims. Feminist critics have taken exception to the centrality of male protagonists in most of her works and consequently the lesser place to which her female characters are relegated. In this essay it is these criticisms that I wish to address.The essay constitutes an attempt to redress the balance and to ascertain whether or not it is possible to assign the term "feminine" to Marguerite Yourcenar's writing.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Magnificent Obsessions: Honouring the Lives of Hazel Rowley |
| Editors | Rosemary Lloyd, Jean Fornasiero |
| Place of Publication | Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom |
| Publisher | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
| Pages | 179-201 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781443847858 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Literature in French
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Marguerite Yourcenar: 'Feminine Writer?''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver