Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Management Skills as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation

Stephen Colbran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    This article proposes two measures of judicial management skills,which may be used in an Australian pilot programme for judicialperformance evaluation. The measures are evaluated by a nationalsurvey of barristers' management skill ratings of Supreme and FederalCourt judges. Barristers who responded to the survey instrumentthought the proposed measures of judicial management skills wereimportant measures of judicial performance. The measures have a highlevel of internal consistency.The article also examines aspects of judicial management skills as ameasure of judicial performance. These aspects include identifyingmeasures of judicial management skills; whether judicial managementskills differ between trial and appellate judges; whether judicialgender affects management skills; whether judicial management skillsdeteriorate with age or experience; and whether older judges treatjunior barristers differently.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)191-208
    JournalUniversity of Western Sydney Law Review
    Volume6
    Publication statusPublished - 2002

    Keywords

    • Legal Practice, Lawyering and the Legal Profession

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Management Skills as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this