Abstract
The rapidly growing field of human-animal studies (HAS) is a vibrant, varied domain of methodological convergences and divergences, united by a shared concern with studying the complex entanglement of human and animal lives. To think seriously about animals on their own terms is to begin to question the co-construction of the categories of the human and the animal that underpins human exceptionalism. Unpicking the human/animal binary, however, is no simple matter: not only is this construction unstable but as prisoners of human language we also have a tendency to reinstate it even as we think we challenge it. This paper will provide an analysis of significant developments and preoccupations in the field of literary HAS. Some of the most vexing questions within this area will be contextualised by way of reference to the Bandit and Michael Vick cases in the US and J.M. Coetzee's Disgrace, in particular the scenes depicting David Lurie's encounter with unwanted dogs at an animal shelter.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 6-14 |
| Journal | Social Alternatives |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2013 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Literary Studies, the Animal Turn, and the Academy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver