Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Linking problems, conclusions and evidence: Primary students' early experiences of planning statistical investigations

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference contributionpeer-review

Abstract

An overview of many primary programs demonstrates the passivity of statistical learning in the junior years. Students are usually provided clean, orderly, simplistic data, or data representations, with which to work. When students are encouraged to collect their own data, it is limited to that which could be expected to cause little difficulty. The focus on contrived and unsophisticated data collection and analysis denies younger students the opportunity to design their own statistical investigations. The research reported here derives from the introduction of the statistical investigative cycle (Wild and Pfannkuch, 1999) to a classroom of 9-10 year old students. The students initially experienced difficulty envisioning the investigation process, despite both explicit instruction and multiple prior experiences with investigative learning. A focus on connecting problems and conclusions to evidence enabled students to plan investigations more efficiently.

Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationData and context in statistics education: Towards an evidence-based society (Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Teaching Statistics)
EditorsChris Reading
Place of PublicationVoorburg, Netherlands
PublisherInternational Statistical Institute (ISI)
ISBN (Print)9789077713549
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventICOTS 8: 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics - Cankarjev dom, Cultural and Congress Centre, Ljubljana, Slovenia
Duration: 11 Jul 201016 Jul 2010

Conference

ConferenceICOTS 8: 8th International Conference on Teaching Statistics
CityLjubljana, Slovenia
Period11/07/1016/07/10

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Linking problems, conclusions and evidence: Primary students' early experiences of planning statistical investigations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this