Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Lines on Maps: Defining Resource Governance Regions from the 'Bottom-Up'

David John Brunckhorst, Ian Reeve

    Research output: Contribution to journalConference articlepeer-review

    Abstract

    River catchments have been the dominant form of regionalisation for natural resource management in many countries since the 1980s. Local governments play a considerable role in planning with ever increasing responsibilities for sustainable environmental management, planning and development controls. There has also been an increasing emphasis on community participation in resource management, which emphasises the need to re-examine the requirements for spatial definition of resource governance regions. This paper proposes three principles. Firstly, the nature and reach of environmental externalities of resource use should determine the size and nesting of resource management regions. Secondly, the boundaries of resource governance regions should enclose areas of greatest interest and importance to local residents. Thirdly, the biophysical characteristics of a resource governance region should be as homogenous as possible, which provides resource planning and management efficiencies. The paper describes a range of concepts and empirical techniques used to apply these principles to the derivation of a resource governance regionalisation of the State of New South Wales, Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1-21
    JournalAustralasian Political Studies Association Annual Conference Refereed Papers
    Publication statusPublished - 2006
    EventAPSA 2006: Australian Political Studies Association Annual Conference - Newcastle, Australia
    Duration: 25 Sept 200627 Sept 2006

    Keywords

    • Natural Resource Management

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Lines on Maps: Defining Resource Governance Regions from the 'Bottom-Up''. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this