Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Legal Liability as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation

Stephen Colbran

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    In Australia the debate concerning legal ability has been focussed onjudicial appointment not performance evaluation of those in office.Despite this limitation the points raised concerning appointment aredirectly relevant to performance evaluation. Judges control the courtroom. Judges interpret, apply rules of evidence and procedure and directly and indirectly affect the way in which barristers present their cases. Chief Justice de Jersey, of the Supreme Courtof Queensland, argues, they must have "high intellect and legal learning", the "capacity to analyse and articulate facts and legal propositions clearly", and "experience in and knowledge of the way litigation is conducted." This may be classified as judicial competence.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)15-34
    JournalThe Newcastle Law Review
    Volume7
    Issue number1
    Publication statusPublished - 2003

    Keywords

    • Law

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Legal Liability as a Criterion for Judicial Performance Evaluation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this