Abstract
The comments formulated by Roxburgh and Roe (2009) seem to be leveling two primary criticisms at Rock, Beischel, and Schwartz (2008): (1) Rock et al.'s methodology compromises the validity of the data and (2) Rock et al. "have yet to fully embrace a qualitative approach to their research questions." Each of these attempted criticisms will be discussed in turn.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-357 |
| Journal | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Is There Madness in Our Mediumship Methods? A Response to Roxburgh and Roe'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver