Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is the care-education dichotomy behind us? Should it be?

  • Margaret Sims

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

34 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

For over a decade we have talked about the care-education dichotomy as being false and irrelevant given that care is considered to be a part of education, not separate from it. A generation of early childhood professionals have grown up in service where care is seen as part of education. As a nation, Australia is now pursuing professionalisation of early childhood through the education discourse. As with any decision, there are positive and negative consequences. In this article I report on a research project that explores early childhood professionals' perspectives of the care-education dichotomy, and the role it plays in early childhood today. I argue that, in order to understand the unintentional consequences of pursuing an educational pathway towards professionalisation, we need to keep the issues relating to care in the front of our minds.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)4-11
JournalAustralasian Journal of Early Childhood
Volume39
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2014

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • Early Childhood Education (excl Maori)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is the care-education dichotomy behind us? Should it be?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this