Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Is Near Enough Good Enough? - Implementing Australia's International Human Rights Torture Criminalisation and Prohibition Obligations in the 'Criminal Code' (Cth)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The welcome domestic implementation of Australia's international torture criminalisation and prohibition obligations in the 'Criminal Code' (Cth) is important in the creation of general torture offences, but also reflects critical contemporary features of Commonwealth human rights policy and the resetting of Australia's relationship with the United Nations human rights system. The legislative and policy choices made provide signals for future human rights endeavours. These choices confirm that modest changes to the legislative drafting would have asserted a more exemplary foundation for Australian international human rights advocacy and set a higher standard for the development of a domestic human rights framework.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-270
JournalAdelaide Law Review
Volume33
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2012

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Keywords

  • International Law (excl International Trade Law)
  • Human Rights Law
  • Constitutional Law

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Near Enough Good Enough? - Implementing Australia's International Human Rights Torture Criminalisation and Prohibition Obligations in the 'Criminal Code' (Cth)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this