Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Interactive Contributions of Genes and Early Experience to Behavioral Development: Sensitive periods and lateralized brain and behavior

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Over recent years studies examining the interaction between genetic and epigenetic factors during the development of behavior have been, to a large extent, pushed aside by the focus on molecular genetics and the accompanying rise of first socio-biology and then evolutionary psychology (Bateson, 2005; Kaplan & Rogers, 2003). Despite this, some research on behavioral development has continued and now it is increasingly apparent, to neuroscientists in particular, that understanding behavior and the influence of experience is essential to expanding knowledge of brain function and development. Gottlieb's concept of "probabilistic epigenesis" is relevant to this understanding (Gottlieb, 2000, 2007; Gottlieb & Lickliter, 2007). It refers to the multiple and reciprocal influences between levels (genetic, neural, behavioral, social, etc.) on an organism's development and hence their contribution to the expression of its phenotype. In other words, his concept replaces the central dogma of molecular biology (e.g., Crick, 1970, and discussed by Lewontin, 1991), which sees causation from genes through proteins to structure and behavior as a unidirectional pathway, by a concept of bidirectionality both within and between levels. Gottlieb's conceptualization of the processes involved in development and expression of phenotype involves continual dynamic interactions between genes and environment (Gottlieb, 1998, 2000, 2002). Other authors too have drawn attention to the complex interactions between genetic and environmental influences and stressed the importance of moving away from reductionist thinking, meaning that the causation of complex behavior should not be reduced to unitary genetic explanations (e.g., Oyama, 1985; Rogers, 1999a; Rose, 1997). Despite their popularity, unitary genetic explanations of complex behavior are fallacious not only because they ignore the complex, multiple interactions between genetic expression and experience but also because they are a static view of the organism (Rose, 1997). This applies to the behavior of all species, from lower organisms to humans.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationHandbook of Developmental Science, Behavior, and Genetics
    EditorsKathryn E Hood, Carolyn Tucker Halpern, Gary Greenberg, Richard M Lerner
    Place of PublicationChichester, United Kingdom
    PublisherBlackwell Publishing Ltd
    Pages400-433
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)9781444327632, 9781405187824
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Keywords

    • Neurosciences

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Interactive Contributions of Genes and Early Experience to Behavioral Development: Sensitive periods and lateralized brain and behavior'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this