Abstract
In historical terms, Australian regional water policy has hinged on the assumption that fresh water was predominantly an input factor into agricultural and industrial production processes in the hinterland and consequently an important determinant of regional development. For this reason, regional water policy was primarily seen as a tool for stimulating regional economic development, and water rights were thus allocated in a "top-down" fashion in line with this goal. Over the first century of federation, water underpinned almost all efforts at inland regional agriculturally based growth policy such as agrarian population redistribution to country areas from the coastal cities, soldier resettlement schemes, and the like. However, over the past three decades, a growing awareness of other imperatives, not least the prevention of environmental degradation in inland Australia, has become much more significant in the shaping of nonmetropolitan water policy.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Water Policy, Tourism and Recreation: Lessons from Australia |
| Editors | Lin Crase, Sue O'Keefe |
| Place of Publication | New York, United States of America |
| Publisher | RFF Press |
| Pages | 82-99 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 1617260878, 9781617260872 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
Publication series
| Name | RFF Press Water Policy Series |
|---|
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Keywords
- Environment and Resource Economics
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Institutional Considerations for Collaborative Behaviour in Tourism and Recreation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver