Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Improving the methodology for rapid consequence assessment of amenity and environmental pests

  • Susan Hester
  • , Jana Mayo

Research output: Book/ReportReportOther

Abstract

International standards and guidelines for assessing the potential consequences of pest and disease incursions work well when impacts are on horticultural and agricultural industries, particularly where the potential economic impacts of a pest or disease can be estimated and/or demonstrated. Difficulties arise, however, when impacts fall largely on the environment, social amenity, human wellbeing and infrastructure - in this context international guidance is less clear on appropriate methodology. In these scenarios the potential economic impacts are more difficult to evaluate and are usually subjective since the value placed on damage will differ between stakeholders. This is the case for an increasing range of pests intercepted at the Australian border, such as certain species of snails, spiders, beetles, millipedes and invasive ants. In addition, information about the biology and behaviour of these pests is often absent, or minimal at best, making decision-making surrounding biosecurity risks of these 'non-industry' pests extremely difficult.

Immediate action is taken to remove threats upon detection at the border, on the basis that the species is exotic and import conditions do not permit contamination of any biosecurity risk material. The potential biosecurity risks posed by these species must nevertheless be assessed, as a decision must be made on whether further action is required (i.e. does the consignment require treatment). Failure to assess the impacts of non-industry pest species in an appropriate, robust and reproducible manner may lead to: inconsistencies in pest regulation decisions; decisions resulting in damage to the Australian economy and environment; and unnecessary confusion and misunderstanding by domestic and international stakeholders. There is therefore a need for the department to be able to rapidly and consistently assess the potential impacts for pests whose impacts are largely on the non-industry sectors of the environment and economy, to support decision making and maintain Australia's favourable biosecurity status.

This project reviewed the large number of existing frameworks and tools that have been developed to identify pests and diseases that pose a high risk of damage to natural environments. Key criteria were identified and used to assess these frameworks and tools in order to select one that could be adopted by the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (the department) to rapidly assess the impacts (i.e. potential consequences) of non-industry pests. One framework and associated tool were selected, tested and slightly modified to make it fit for purpose. This report describes that process.

Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationMelbourne, Australia
PublisherCentre of Excellence for Biosecurity Risk Analysis (CEBRA)
Number of pages75
Publication statusPublished - May 2021

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Improving the methodology for rapid consequence assessment of amenity and environmental pests'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this