Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Hypocrisy, Standing to Blame and Second-Personal Authority

  • Adam Piovarchy

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

30 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper identifies why hypocrites lack the standing to blame others for certain wrongs. By identifying problems with thinking of hypocritical blame as inappropriate and examining how the concept of standing is used in other contexts, I argue that we should think of standing to blame as a status that grants agents a normative power. Using Darwall's account of second-personal obligations, I argue that hypocrites lack the standing to blame because they lack the authority to blame. Hypocrites lack this authority because they fail to accept other people's second-personal authority to make similar demands on them.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)603-627
JournalPacific Philosophical Quarterly
Volume101
Issue number4
Early online date30 Jul 2020
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2020

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Hypocrisy, Standing to Blame and Second-Personal Authority'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this