Abstract
In 2010, Pakistan was hit by the worst flood in the century. A total of 1.6 million homes were damaged and 0.9 million utterly destroyed or washed away (World Bank, 2010), meaning that more than 5 million people were left homeless. This is equivalent to a quarter of the Australian population. The task of rebuilding was, and always is, a formidable one for cash-constrained developing countries like Pakistan. This holds both for individual households who have lost their home and for the government that might wish to help them. Because resources and funding are limited, government must set priorities and often make hard choices. If help is to be offered to the victims, what is to be rebuilt first and what later? Who is to be helped first and whom later? Should the amount of help differ between victims and if so, how?
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Natural Hazards and Disaster Justice: Challenges for Australia and Its Neighbours |
| Editors | Anna Lukasiewicz, Caludia Baldwin |
| Place of Publication | Singapore |
| Publisher | Palgrave Macmillan |
| Pages | 151-166 |
| Edition | 1 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9789811504655, 9789811504662 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 13 Climate Action
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'How to Be Fair in Prioritizing Support in the Aftermath of Disasters: Pakistan's Housing Reconstruction Challenges Following the 2010 Flood Disaster'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver