Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

How Should Governments Make Risky Policy Decisions?

  • John Brian Hardaker
  • , Euan Fleming
  • , Gudbrand Lien

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    25 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Public policy-making does not follow the long-established and well-recognised principles of rational decision analysis under risk. Public views of risk are often inconsistent and seemingly irrational, and a gulf exists between risk perceptions and attitudes of the public and those of 'experts'. On the other hand, experts often claim unjustifiably high levels of confidence in their predictions of policy choice outcomes, creating a lack of public faith in their recommendations. While risky policy choices deserve more systematic decision analysis, many challenges remain to effective implementation of such analyses. Among the suggestions for improvement that we offer is the need for more effective interaction between policy-makers, decision analysts and the public.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)256-271
    JournalAustralian Journal of Public Administration
    Volume68
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • Public Economics- Publically Provided Goods
    • Public Economics- Public Choice
    • Public Policy

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'How Should Governments Make Risky Policy Decisions?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this