Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

High activity antioxidant enzymes protect flying-fox haemoglobin against damage: an evolutionary adaptation for flight?

N Reinke, GM O'Brien

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    4 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Flying-foxes are better able to defend haemoglobin against autoxidation than non-volant mammals such as sheep. When challenged with the common physiological oxidant, hydrogen peroxide, haemolysates of flying-fox red blood cells (RBC) were far less susceptible to methaemoglobin formation than sheep. Challenge with 1-acetyl-2-phenylhydrazine (APH) caused only half as much methaemoglobin formation in flying-fox as in ovine haemolysates. When intact cells were challenged with phenazine methosulfate (PMS), flying-fox RBC partially reversed the oxidant damage, and reduced methaemoglobin from 40 to 20% over 2 h incubation, while ovine methaemoglobin remained at 40%. This reflected flying-fox cells' capacity to replenish GSH fast enough that it did not deplete beyond 50%, while ovine RBC GSH was depleted to around 20%. The greater capacity of flying-foxes to defend haemoglobin against oxidant damage may be explained in part by antioxidant enzymes catalase, superoxide dismutase and cytochrome-b 5 reductase having two- to four-fold higher activity than in sheep (P < 0.001). Further, their capacity to limit GSH depletion to 50% and reduce methaemoglobin (in the presence of glucose), despite ongoing exposure to PMS may result from having ten-fold higher activity of G6PD and 6PGD than sheep (P < 0.001), indicating the presence of a very efficient pentose phosphate pathway in flying-foxes.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)729-737
    JournalJournal of Comparative Physiology B
    Volume176
    Issue number8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2006

    Keywords

    • Cell Metabolism

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'High activity antioxidant enzymes protect flying-fox haemoglobin against damage: an evolutionary adaptation for flight?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this