Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Governing Crime at a Distance: Spatiality, Law and Justice

Russell G Hogg

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    Abstract

    Legal ideology depicts law as a spatially invariant practice. There is mounting evidence, however, of gross geographical disparities in the administration of justice in Australia. This article reviews this evidence as it relates to one body of law and practice in one Australian jurisdiction - namely, sentencing and punishment in New South Wales. It considers some of the possible implications of the failure to provide effective justice and governance infrastructures in some rural and remote areas. The purpose is not so much to indict the justice system for failing to live up to its promise of equal treatment, as to stress the need both to take spatiality seriously in relation to law, justice and governance and to consider the practical challenges it poses under present conditions in Australia.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)361-377
    JournalCurrent Issues in Criminal Justice
    Volume22
    Issue number3
    Publication statusPublished - 2011

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
      SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

    Keywords

    • Courts and Sentencing
    • Law and Society
    • Criminal Law and Procedure

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Governing Crime at a Distance: Spatiality, Law and Justice'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this