Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Genotyping Strategies of Selection Candidates in Sheep Breeding Programs

Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article › peer-review

Abstract

Genotyping strategies for both ram and ewe selection candidates were investigated to maximise the benefit of genomic selection while minimising genotyping costs. Through stochastic simulation we investigated both early and late-stage genomic selection of rams using a selection index that contained an early in life measurement (post-weaning weight) and a hard to measure trait (intra-muscular fat) that was not measured on selection candidates. We also simulated genotyping strategies for female selection candidates in breeding programs using natural mating, multiple ovulation and embryo transfer (MOET) or juvenile in vitro fertilisation and embryo transfer (JIVET). Our results showed that genomic selection of rams lifted genetic gain by 40%. Genomic testing the top 20% of ram selection candidates achieved 80% of the maximum benefit using late-stage genomic selection, while testing 47% of the top ranked rams implementing early-stage genomic selection was required to achieve 80% of the benefit. Genetic gain lifted by a maximum of 15-65% for genomic testing in (only) ewe selection candidates. To achieve 80% of the maximum benefit of genomic selection, 65%, 35% and 45% of ewe selection candidates required genomic testing each year for natural, MOET and JIVET breeding programs, respectively. Genotyping ram selection candidates provided the best value for money.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-336
JournalProceedings of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics
Volume22
Publication statusPublished - 2017
EventAAABG 2017: 22nd Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics - Townsville, Australia
Duration: 2 Jul 2017 → 5 Jul 2017

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Genotyping Strategies of Selection Candidates in Sheep Breeding Programs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this