Abstract
In this article, I shall argue that there is a way in which one might coherently read concurrent claims about the transcendence and immanence of God, such as those made by the feminist theologian, Elisabeth Schüssler Fiorenza. I shall argue that transcendence should not be read as oppositional to immanence and, following Levinas, I shall also argue that transcendence is not a property, but a relation. I claim that transcendence and In nity are closely connected, that they are analogous to Irigaray's use of jouissance and that language itself is the originary site of transcendence. I begin with a discussion of the central theoretical terms employed by Schüssler Fiorenza.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 333-344 |
| Journal | Australian Feminist Studies |
| Volume | 14 |
| Issue number | 30 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1999 |
Keywords
- Philosophy of Religion
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'G*d's Excludedness: Beyond Language, Beyond the World: A Levinasian Reading of Ekklesia Gynaikon'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver