Abstract
This article takes as its central theme the idea that in developing the Australian counter-terrorism response of the ASIO questioning and detention regime, distinctive, identifiable characteristics have emerged in the Government approach to international and comparative examples necessarily referred and responded to as justifying that development. These characteristics may be conveniently described as the Australianisation of international and comparative counter-terrorism examples, or selective internationalism, and these features are variously manifested in the areas examined in this article.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-58 |
| Journal | Adelaide Law Review |
| Volume | 27 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2006 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- International Law (excl. International Trade Law)
- Constitutional Law
- Human Rights Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Gathered intelligence or Antipodean exceptionalism? Securing the development of ASIO's detention and questioning regime'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver