Abstract
In recent years, bibliometrics has been used to measure the utility of publications by means of systematically counting the amount of times a publication has been cited. This could not have been carried out without the use and accessibility of information electronically on the Internet. The intent of bibliometrics is to legitimise, justify, and acknowledge 'quality' information coming from credible sources, but it has also introduced the study of scholarly research performance, which has resulted in some rather unfortunate consequences. Among other things, it has been found that research performance and impact cannot be measured by the quantity of publications or by a ranking of impact factors relating to journals.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-2 |
| Journal | International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 4 Quality Education
Keywords
- Comparative and Cross-Cultural Education
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'From the Editor - International Education Journal: Comparative Perspectives - Volume 10, Number 1, 2011'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver