Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Firm size differences in financial returns from flexible work arrangements (FWAs)

Bernice Kotey, Isaac Koomson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Firms of differing sizes make FWAs available to employees, with varying performance outcomes. Research on the financial outcomes of FWAs is sparse and tends to focus on large firms. This study investigates the associations between FWAs and return on labour (ROL) as well as the relevance of these associations to small, medium and large firms, using a sample of 3244 employees working in 602 businesses. The findings show negative associations between flexible leave as FWA and ROL for all firms. Job-sharing has financial value for firms with 100 or more workers, with the majority being females but it is not feasible in small firms due to limited employee numbers. Flexible work hours pay off for firms with up to 99 employees but the financial outcomes become negative thereafter, requiring closer monitoring in larger firms. The findings indicate that firm size is relevant to FWA regulations and negotiations with implications for employers, employees and policymakers.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)65-81
JournalSmall Business Economics
Volume56
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Firm size differences in financial returns from flexible work arrangements (FWAs)'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this