Abstract
The decision of the 'Privy Council in the case of Robinson v The Balmain New Ferry Company Ltd' remains a part of many tort courses, and tort textbooks, in common law countries. I am as guilty of this as the many others to whom I refer. Yet the reason for including it tends to be to dismiss it as an aberration to a general rule, a case that is non-representative rather than paradigmatic. Whilst for doctrinal explanatory purposes this is a perfectly satisfactory way of dealing with the case, it is an interesting question to consider why the case did not set any kind of general principle – why the dog did not bark rather than why it did.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Publication status | Published - 2007 |
| Event | BLHC 2007: 18th British Legal History Conference: Judges and Judging - Oxford, United Kingdom Duration: 2 Jul 2007 → 5 Jul 2007 |
Conference
| Conference | BLHC 2007: 18th British Legal History Conference: Judges and Judging |
|---|---|
| City | Oxford, United Kingdom |
| Period | 2/07/07 → 5/07/07 |
Keywords
- History and Philosophy of Law and Justice
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Federation, Fare Dodging and False Imprisonment - Mr Robertson's Evening Out'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver