Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Explicating inter-modal meaning-making in media and literary texts: Towards a metalanguage of image/language relations

Len Unsworth

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

There appears to be a widespread consensus among educational researchers from diverse discipline backgrounds that literacy and literacy pedagogy can no longer be discussed in terms of language alone, and that reconceptualizing literacy and literacy education at least needs to incorporate the role of images in an increasing range of different types of texts. It is also the case that syllabi for the teaching of English in government schools in most Australian States require students to learn about the role of images in their comprehension of various kinds of texts and, to a lesser extent, their composition of texts for a variety of purposes. Although there is a tendency for work on the meaning-making resources of images and language to be compartmentalized in separate categories for 'reading' and 'viewing', the incorporation of attention to the role of images in texts seems to be uncontentious in contemporary English teaching. What is and has long been contentious in English teaching in Australia, the United Kingdom and North America is the role of metalanguage, the type of grammar, its purpose in the curriculum and approaches to its teaching.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMedia Teaching: Language, Audience and Production
EditorsAndrew Burn, Cal Durrant
Place of PublicationKent Town, Australia
PublisherWakefield Press
Pages48-78
Edition1
ISBN (Print)9781862548077
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Publication series

NameAATE interface series

Keywords

  • English and Literacy Curriculum and Pedagogy (excl LOTE, ESL and TESOL)

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Explicating inter-modal meaning-making in media and literary texts: Towards a metalanguage of image/language relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this