Abstract
We, the ExTraMATCH II collaborative, recently completed an individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis on the effect of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation (ExCR) on mortality and hospitalisation in patients with heart failure. This analysis considered 18 randomised controlled trials, which included 3912 people with heart failure who were randomised to an ExCR intervention or control group (treatment as usual). Unlike the original ExTraMATCH IPD meta-analysis published in 2004 by Piepoli et al., this latest analysis did not demonstrate mortality and hospitalisation benefits from ExCR in patients with heart failure. We believe that some of the reasons for this difference in findings could be attributed to the data provided by the individual trials. We share here some of the data problems we encountered and provide our insights. In doing so, we also propose some recommendations for both future study designs and funding bodies, so that we may move towards a more efficacious approach to managing heart failure with ExCR in the future.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1229-1231 |
| Journal | European Journal of Preventive Cardiology |
| Volume | 26 |
| Issue number | 11 |
| Early online date | 22 Nov 2018 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2019 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Exercise training for chronic heart failure (ExTraMATCH II): Why all data are not equal'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver