Abstract
Food is generally not viewed as a medicinal product. However, advertisements for food which bear therapeutic claims may result in the food being classified as a medicinal product. In the United States and Malaysia, the general rule is that food is classified as a medicinal product if therapeutic claims are made in the advertisements. The general rule is, however, subject to exemptions, and the exemptions in the two jurisdictions vary considerably. This article examines the implications of these exemptions for consumer protection in the two jurisdictions. It explores whether or not there is inadequate protection for consumers when food, which qualifies as a medicinal product, is not so classified and, accordingly subject to regulation as a medical product.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages | 1-23 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| Event | ICPL 2011: International Conference on Emerging Issues In Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives - Shah Alam, Malaysia Duration: 13 Dec 2011 → 14 Dec 2011 |
Conference
| Conference | ICPL 2011: International Conference on Emerging Issues In Public Law: Challenges and Perspectives |
|---|---|
| City | Shah Alam, Malaysia |
| Period | 13/12/11 → 14/12/11 |
Keywords
- Commercial and Contract Law
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Excluding Food from Classification as Medicinal Products: The Implication on Consumer Protection'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver