Abstract
Existing evidence has demonstrated that sanctions affect unemployment payment recipients' behaviour. However, in addition to financial impacts, sanction application includes administrative processes. This study examines a feature of Australian unemployment benefits, whereby jobseekers not meeting requirements may face a zero‐dollar sanction (termed suspension). The results indicate a strong behavioural response, with previously suspended jobseekers 13.1 percentage points more likely to attend their next appointment. Further, ongoing behavioural change was observed, even for jobseekers with a history of previous non‐compliance. This suggests temporary payment suspension and associated administrative processes are effective at securing behavioural change, without the need for lasting financial impact.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 490-505 |
| Journal | The Economic Record |
| Volume | 96 |
| Issue number | 315 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Aug 2020 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Examining the Effects of Zero‐Dollar Unemployment Payment Sanctions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver