Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Examining EAL/D teachers’ practices in regional Australian multilingual classrooms through the lens of pedagogical judgement

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

In culturally and linguistically diverse school settings, English as an Additional Language or Dialect (EAL/D) specialist teachers play a critical role in fostering equitable, socially just, and responsive learning environments. In Australia, EAL/D learners are students whose first language is not Standard Australian English (SAE) and who require targeted support to develop proficiency in SAE. This paper reports on a study examining EAL/D teachers’ reported pedagogical practices that nurture multilingual students’ plurilingual repertoires as acts of social justice. Framed through pedagogical judgement—encompassing action, reasoning, and responsibility—the study explored how teachers leveraged students’ cultural and linguistic resources as learning assets. Data were generated through in-depth semi-structured interviews with five EAL/D specialist teachers working with newly arrived Ezidi refugee-background students in a regional town in New South Wales. Findings indicate that teachers enacted inclusive, plurilingual practices grounded in strong pedagogical reasoning and a moral commitment to equity. Despite recognising persistent monolingual and deficit discourses, teachers actively challenged these narratives by affirming students’ linguistic and cultural identities.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-22
JournalPedagogy, Culture and Society
DOIs
Publication statusE-pub ahead of print - 4 Feb 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Examining EAL/D teachers’ practices in regional Australian multilingual classrooms through the lens of pedagogical judgement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this