Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Evolution of the vomer and its implications for cranial kinesis in Paraves

Han Hu, Gabriele Sansalone, Stephen Wroe, Paul G McDonald, Jingmai K O’Connor, Zhiheng Li, Xing Xu, Zhonghe Zhou

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

33 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Most living birds exhibit cranial kinesis-movement between the rostrum and braincase-in which force is transferred through the palatal and jugal bars. The palate alone distinguishes the Paleognathae from the Neognathae, with cranial kinesis more developed in neognaths. Most previous palatal studies were based on 2D data and rarely incorporated data from stem birds despite great interest in their kinetic abilities. Here we reconstruct the vomer of the Early Cretaceous stem bird Sapeornis and the troodontid Sinovenator, taxa spanning the dinosaur-bird transition. A 3D shape analysis including these paravians and an extensive sampling of neornithines reveals their strong similarity to paleognaths and indicates that morphological differences in the vomer between paleognaths and neognaths are intimately related to their different kinetic abilities. These results suggest the skull of Mesozoic paravians lacked the kinetic abilities observed in neognaths, a conclusion also supported by our identification of an ectopterygoid in Sapeornis here. We conclude that cranial kinesis evolved relatively late, likely an innovation of the Neognathae, and is linked to the transformation of the vomer. This transformation increased palatal mobility, enabling the evolution of a diversity of kinetic mechanisms and ultimately contributing to the extraordinary evolutionary success of this clade.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)19571-19578
JournalProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Volume116
Issue number39
Early online date9 Sept 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 24 Sept 2019

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Evolution of the vomer and its implications for cranial kinesis in Paraves'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this