Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Eucalyptus was not the problem: A response to “The genus problem – Eucalyptus as a model system for minimising taxonomic disruption” by Nicolle & al

  • Lyn G Cook
  • , Michael D Crisp
  • , David E Albrecht
  • , Rose L Andrew
  • , Michael J Bayly
  • , Anthony R Bean
  • , Ed Biffin
  • , Gillian K Brown
  • , Jeremy J Bruhl
  • , David J Cantrill
  • , John G Conran
  • , Darren M Crayn
  • , Nicholas Cuff
  • , Peter C Jobson
  • , Pauline Y Ladiges
  • , Todd G B McLay
  • , Daniel J Murphy
  • , Francis J Nge
  • , Susan Rutherford
  • , Ian R H Telford
  • Kevin R Thiele, Frank Udovicic, Michelle Waycott, Peter G Wilson, Andrew H Thornhill

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In a recent perspective paper in Taxon, Nicolle and coauthors advocate a broad circumscription of the Australian genus Eucalyptus (Myrtaceae), based on six “rules” for delimiting plant genera. The current consensus, established through the Australian Plant Census (APC), is a three-genus classification system (Angophora, Corymbia, Eucalyptus) that has been widely accepted for almost 20 years. We argue that their application of the “rules” to eucalypts is questionable as it sometimes uses misleading or misinterpreted evidence, and misrepresents the current status of eucalypt taxonomy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)507-514
JournalTaxon
Volume74
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 30 Jun 2025

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Eucalyptus was not the problem: A response to “The genus problem – Eucalyptus as a model system for minimising taxonomic disruption” by Nicolle & al'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this