Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethnobiological classification and the environment in Northern Australia

  • Brett Baker

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

    Abstract

    Among Indigenous Australian folk taxonomic systems, we find two general characteristics. Firstly, the great majority of botanical names refer to species, while genera remain unnamed. I argue that this fact follows from the unique structure of the Australian flora, which is dominated by species from just a few very large genera. The importance of this fact has hitherto not been recognised by ethnobiological systematics. Secondly, taxonomic names are simple, monomorphemic ("monomial") names. Moreover, the binomial names characteristic of folk generics elsewhere are not permitted in most Australian languages. Both these characteristics are difficult to reconcile with the universals of folk taxonomy proposed by Berlin and associates (Berlin, Breedlove & Raven 1973; Berlin 1992).
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationMental States: Language and cognitive structure
    EditorsAndrea C. Schalley, Drew Khlentzos
    Place of PublicationAmsterdam, Netherlands
    PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing Company
    Pages239-265
    Volume2
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)9789027231031
    Publication statusPublished - 2007

    Publication series

    NameStudies in Language Companion Series
    Number93

    Keywords

    • Linguistic Structures (incl Grammar, Phonology, Lexicon, Semantics)

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethnobiological classification and the environment in Northern Australia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this