Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Ethics, Psychologists' Practices, and Psychological Theory

William Noble

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Rosenzweig (1979) reports that the State University of New York at Albany in 1977 faced the threat of a fine of $US100 000 for violations to the state's Protection of Human Subjects law. In particular the University admitted failure to obtain proper consent from participants (in a series of psychological experiments), failure to fairly explain the risks involved, failure to have the experimental procedures reviewed by an institutional panel, and failure to have the experiments properly supervised. If that sort of law existed in this country I believe we would see many similar actions being brought to court. And I further believe that such treatment would be deserved. My own experience, gained since getting involved several years ago in matters of professional ethics, is that attempts to educate certain elements in one's profession are a waste of time. Legal proceedings are needed so that professional members are forced to focus on aspects of their conduct which violate basic human rights. Once that is achieved the process of education might be more profitably pursued.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationIssues in Psychological Practice
    EditorsMary Creighton Nixon
    Place of PublicationMelbourne, Australia
    PublisherLongman Cheshire
    Pages50-80
    Edition1
    ISBN (Print)9780582711266
    Publication statusPublished - 1984

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Ethics, Psychologists' Practices, and Psychological Theory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this