Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Emissions from bioenergy: Improved accounting options and new policy needs

Neil Bird, Annette Cowie, Susanne Woess-Gallasch, Giuliana Zanchi, Dorian Frieden, Leif Gustavsson, Naomi Pena, Kim Pingoud, Sebastian Reuter, Roger Sathre, Sampo Soimakallio, Andreas Tuerk

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaper

Abstract

A recent paper by Searchinger highlighted that Annex-I nations do not count CO₂ emissions due to combustion of biomass in their commitments. This is because it is assumed that emissions from use of biomass are accounted for in the land use sector, where they should appear as reductions in carbon stocks. However, if the biomass comes from a non-Annex I country, these reductions are not counted within the Kyoto Protocol. Indeed, even Annex I countries do not necessarily fully account for carbon stock losses associated with bioenergy. This results in overestimating the mitigation benefits of bioenergy. The problem can be rectified by modifying the accounting system, adopting new policy measures or a combination of both. In this paper, we describe possible options and policy measures to improve the accounting of emissions from bioenergy. The pros and cons of the identified solutions are also discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Pages98-102
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
EventEUBCE 2010: 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition: From Research to Industry and Markets - Lyon, France
Duration: 3 May 20107 May 2010

Conference

ConferenceEUBCE 2010: 18th European Biomass Conference and Exhibition: From Research to Industry and Markets
CityLyon, France
Period3/05/107/05/10

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action
  2. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Forestry Biomass and Bioproducts
  • Environmental Management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Emissions from bioenergy: Improved accounting options and new policy needs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this