Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Effects of Schedules of Reinforcement on Behavioural Variability

Leanne Neshausen, James McEwan, Lewis Bizo

Research output: Contribution to conferenceAbstract

Abstract

As an extension of Boren, Moerschbaecher, & Whyte, (1978), Experiment 1 was a comparison of schedules of reinforcement on location variability. Hens worked in an operant chamber across five keys that were arranged horizontally. A peck to any key was equally effective. Interval schedules were yoked to ratio schedules. Eight schedules were examined: FR 40, FR 10, FI y-40, FI y-10, VR 40, VR 10, VI y-40 and VI y-10. Location variability was measured as the percentage of switching across keys from within trials, between trials (the reinforced peck location to the first peck location of the following trial), and the number of keys used. It was hypothesised that more variation would occur from schedules with large inter-reinforcer-intervals rather than short, and also that interval schedules would result in more variations than ratio schedules. Hypotheses were not up held, however a correlation of response rate and variability was found. In Experiment 2, six new hens worked on a series of (across session) incrementing DRL schedules, from DRL 0.5-sec to DRL 19.2-sec. Results found no correlation of response rate and variability. However, far more within trial switches were observed in Experiment 2 than Experiment 1, suggesting need for further study.
Original languageEnglish
Publication statusPublished - 2012
EventABAI 2012: 38th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International - Seattle, United States of America
Duration: 25 May 201229 May 2012

Conference

ConferenceABAI 2012: 38th Annual Convention of the Association for Behavior Analysis International
CitySeattle, United States of America
Period25/05/1229/05/12

Keywords

  • Sensory Processes, Perception and Performance
  • Cognitive Sciences
  • Psychology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effects of Schedules of Reinforcement on Behavioural Variability'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this