Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Dynamic optimization for evaluating externalities in agroforestry systems

Oscar Jose Cacho, Robyn Hean

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapterResearch

Abstract

Integrating trees in cropping and grazing systems – agroforestry – can provide many benefits in the Australian agricultural context. These include the production of timber and non-timber products such as oils and flowers, fodder, windbreak protection, shade and shelter, wildlife habitat, flood mitigation, soil-erosion control, improved water quality, and reduced dryland-salinity emergence. Prinsley (1992), – Cleugh, Prinsley, Bird, Brooks, Carberry, and Crawford et al. (2002) and other authors in the same volumes present some examples for Australia. Many of the benefits from trees are off-farm environmental services, which are public goods or externalities and which landholders may not take into account. The social benefits from trees may therefore exceed the private benefits, and given such a divergence, landholders may conserve and plant too few trees from a social perspective. Without perfect information, landholders may even underestimate their private benefits from trees and further exacerbate this divergence. Concern for this issue is not new in Australia (see Tisdell, 1985). Market failure due to externalities and imperfect information provides a rationale for government intervention to encourage landholders to invest in vegetation management and reforestation. Regulatory, extension, and market-based approaches are all being used to this end by governments in Australia. State Governments have established regulatory controls on land clearing of private native vegetation (Walpole, 1999; Stoneham, Chaudhri, Ha, & Strappazzon, 2003), such as the Native Vegetation Conservation Act in New South Wales (NSW) and The Planning and Environment Act in Victoria. State and Federal Governments have also implemented extension programs to provide funds and/or assistance to landholders and community groups to manage native vegetation on private land. At the State level, these programs include Land for Wildlife and Trust for Nature in Victoria, and the Voluntary Conservation Agreement Program in Queensland. At the Federal level, there is Landcare, One Billion Trees, Save the Bush, Bushcare, National Heritage Trust, and the National Action Plan for Salinity and Water Quality. Stoneham et al.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationValuing Agroforestry Systems: methods and applications
EditorsJRR Alavalapati, DE Mercer
Place of PublicationDordrecht, Netherlands
PublisherKluwer Academic Publishers
Pages139-163
Volume2
Edition1
ISBN (Print)1402024126
Publication statusPublished - 2004

Publication series

NameAdvances in agroforestry

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 15 - Life on Land
    SDG 15 Life on Land

Keywords

  • Environment and Resource Economics

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Dynamic optimization for evaluating externalities in agroforestry systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this